By Justin Fein
Sleep apnea remains a critical area of clinical focus, particularly as diagnosis rates rise and treatment technologies evolve. To better understand frontline perspectives, we surveyed 50 nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) specializing in sleep disorders about their prescribing habits and care pathways for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The findings offer valuable insight into how this cohort is influencing device prescribing, referral decisions, and long-term care.
PAs and NPs report prescribing a wide variety of positive airway pressure (PAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) devices. This diversity reflects a personalized approach to treatment planning, tailored to the unique clinical and lifestyle needs of their OSA patients. Given that each respondent manages a significant number of adult OSA patients monthly, their clinical reach is substantial, particularly in settings where access to sleep specialists may be limited.
When it comes to initiating prescriptions, respondents shared a range of practice patterns. Many initiate the prescription process themselves, often transitioning ongoing management to a respiratory therapist or sleep specialist. Others work within care models where sleep medicine providers take the lead on prescription decisions. These variations illustrate the flexibility of team-based care and the adaptability of NPs and PAs to different clinical workflows.
Referral practices also vary depending on case severity and clinical setting. Some providers refer patients to sleep medicine or pulmonology specialists only in severe or complex cases. Others, particularly those based in pulmonology clinics, manage device therapy in-house, showcasing a high level of autonomy and integrated care.
Long-term monitoring of adherence and device performance is typically a shared responsibility, involving a combination of PAs, NPs, respiratory therapists, and sleep specialists. This collaborative approach is essential to maintaining patient engagement and optimizing treatment outcomes over time.
Additionally, many of the surveyed providers hold or are eligible for advanced certifications in sleep care. This trend toward greater specialization enhances their capacity to deliver high-quality, evidence-based treatment within their scope of practice.
Open-text responses further contextualized these patterns. One respondent highlighted managing most of their patients’ device therapy independently due to limited specialist access. Another emphasized the need to consider real-world usability when prescribing, pointing to the balance between clinical guidelines and practical patient considerations.
If you are a healthcare worker that is interested in participating in our paid research studies, please register here.